The writing of this paper has been in the works ever since the development and release of the Coronavirus mRNA vaccines. The topic is of particular interest since the LW President, Gordon, sees this vaccine type as a Satanic creation in these troubled times, leading to the prospective mark of the beast and the ultimate destruction of mankind in this world.
Whilst I am sympathetic to this view, I am concerned that there is a great deal of false information out there provided both by the ‘authorities’ and their media henchmen but also from the anti-establishment sources that I would normally align my views with. Being of a somewhat cynical nature, I find myself distrusting all these sources currently. I see those ‘alternative’ sources of information being corrupted and thereby adding their credence to the establishment views by providing outrageous and obviously false claims on these vaccines. Consequently, I have decided to embark on my own research mission to determine, to the best of my ability, the truth of the matter. I see it as my current duty as a LW church member to ensure that I am happy with current church thinking on the subject, and its rationale, since it is leading us down a particular path that I should either like to confirm or help steer the church down an alternative route should that prove necessary.
Why me? Well, I am known by my brethren for asking the difficult questions on a subject until I get to what I think is the truth of the matter, like a dog with a bone. Also, this could well represent a missing piece from my recent end-times paper (Signs of The End Times – Part 2). Finally, but certainly not least, I think that my work on the viral war that has been waged over the millennia (Scientists v God) is something that has given me some early relevant understanding in the matter. This should, hopefully, place me in a good position to make the judgements necessary to ascertain the realities on this issue. You will find several references to that paper sprinkled throughout this present work to illustrate a comparison between the virus and the vaccine operations. I guess I now know why the Holy Spirit directed me to write that paper several years ago; to prepare me for the current moment. Mind you, it kept one little surprise in store for this highly inexperienced virologist as you will discover a little further down this paper!
Similarly, to that paper, this one will also unusually not be heavily based on the scriptures, at least to start with. I will need to make my ‘microbiological’ assessment based purely on the science. Hopefully, I should then be able to review the current LW understandings on the subject and determine whether the associated interpretations on scriptures stack up in the face of the knowledge that I have gained through this exercise. As always, my only interest is to determine the truth of the matter regardless of where that may lead. Amen.
Before I am accused of having antivaxx views, I should like to remind my readers of the historical success of vaccine programmes in the past. This cannot be denied and for which yours truly has been a grateful recipient over the years. This WHO paper describes this success, in a comprehensive manner, for those who are interested: https://ourworldindata.org/vaccination#global-decline-in-vaccine-preventable-diseases. In concert with my LW Brothers in Christ, I see the current pandemic in terms of the virus and its variants, the draconian measures being used to control the world’s population, the vaccines produced specifically for Covid-19 and the associated testing all as being specifically and demonically orchestrated at this time. None of this, however, should cast doubt on the works of the honest biochemists of the past.
So, let us make a start by looking how the mRNA vaccines work.
Transportation into The Cell
COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are given in the upper arm muscle (deltoid). This is in common with most vaccines administered by injection since muscle contains many blood vessels and is a way to ensure the vaccine gets into the bloodstream relatively quickly. Once in the bloodstream, the vaccine’s payload of mRNA protein molecule elements can then find their way to ‘attack’ a human cell. The way they avoid being attacked by the white blood cells before they make cellular contact is due to their encapsulation within a lipid nanoparticle (LNP) wrapper.
The LNP encapsulation of the mRNA protein molecule also hides it from the target cell’s external surface security proteins. Consequently, the payload’s foreign protein nature is not exposed to the body’s immune system, and the package effectively poses as a cell nutrient. So, LNPs hide the genetic material of the mRNA vaccine which would otherwise be recognised and destroyed as such by the body’s immune responses.
Now, for reference, a little definition is required before we progress any further. The cellular ‘cytoplasm’ consists of all of the cell contents residing outside of the cell nucleus but enclosed within the outer cell membrane. It is clear in colour and has a gel-like appearance. Cytoplasm is composed mainly of water but also contains enzymes, salts, organelles, and various organic molecules. The cytoplasm functions to support and suspend those organelles and cellular molecules. Many cellular processes also occur in the cytoplasm, such as protein synthesis, the first stage of cellular respiration (known as glycolysis), mitosis, and meiosis. The cytoplasm helps to move materials, such as hormones, around the cell and also dissolves cellular waste.
The vaccine’s LNP capsule is able to enter the target cell through a process of endocytosis by which it is engulfed by the cell’s outer membrane and pinched off to enter the cytoplasm (https://www.thoughtco.com/cytoplasm-defined-373301) surrounded by a bubble of the cell’s membrane material (https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-endocytosis-4163670). The reader may wish to compare this entry method with how the adenovirus can enter the cell membrane (Scientists v God Battle Plan point 4).
This bubble is called an endosome. Once inside the cell’s outer membrane, the bio-active mRNA vaccine component must escape the endosome to deliver its payload. The LNPs have been designed to respond to the acidic pH environment within the endosome, thereby triggering endosomal escape and intracellular payload release into the cytoplasm (Battle Plan point 6 in Scientists v God).
Clearly the LNP is a highly sophisticated bio-engineered product that has several complex tasks to achieve at both the extra- and intra-cellular level. The pharmaceutical industry identifies the key performance criteria for an LNP delivery system as to maximize cellular uptake and enable efficient release of mRNA from the endosome. At the same time, the LNP must provide a stable drug product and be able to be dosed safely at therapeutically relevant levels. Size also matters. To provide such a multi-facetted capability for an intra-cellular delivery mechanism, LNPs are necessarily multi-component systems that typically consist of an amino lipid, phospholipid, cholesterol, and a PEG-lipid.
Each of these components is required for different aspects of efficient delivery of the nucleic acid cargo and stability of the particle. The key component considered to drive cellular uptake, endosomal escape, and tolerability is the amino lipid. Cholesterol and the PEG-lipid contribute to the stability of the drug product both in vivo and on the shelf. The phospholipid provides additional fusogenicity (ability to fuse with cells) to the LNP, thus helping to drive endosomal escape and rendering the nucleic acid bioavailable in the cytosol (semi-fluid component or liquid medium of a cell's cytoplasm).
I must confess that, at first sight, this ‘sneak’ attack on a targeted human cell by evading the initial immune response, to the extent that entry into the cell’s outer membrane is easily enabled, does sound worryingly invasive to the lay mind, such as mine. The LNP alone therefore helps the vaccine payload evade the first five cellular defence mechanisms of the human immune system (Scientists v God). However, let us proceed further with this investigation before jumping to conclusions at too early a stage…
Overview of How a Vaccine Generates an Immune Response
Why are vaccines (including mRNA types) injected into muscle cells? Muscle has an excellent blood supply to help disperse the vaccine. Muscle contains and recruits immune cells called dendritic cells, which take up antigens quickly and stick them on their surface, like a flag. The dendritic cells then migrate to and slip into lymph nodes. There, they encounter T cells and B cells — white blood cells that help defend our body against specific pathogens.
A dendritic cell will present its flag to T and B cells until it finds those that recognise the antigen, then gives them the signal to multiply and, in the case of B cells, start manufacturing antibodies. So, in the specific case of COVID-19 vaccines, that amplification means they can block SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins so that the virus can no longer get into a cell. They also start to form that pool of long-lived memory, antibodies, which is really what we want from the main outcome of a vaccine.
Whilst not part of my investigation, I found the following website to be of interest in determining what aspects of immunisation may still enable the recipient to ‘carry’ the virus: https://qz.com/1954762/can-you-spread-covid-19-if-you-get-the-vaccine/?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-en-GB.
Well, that is the overview for any vaccine to work effectively. Now, let us have a more detailed look at exactly how the mRNA fragment is dealt with within this overall framework. As usual I expect the devil (literally) to be in the detail.
What is mRNA and How Do mRNA Vaccines Work?
Messenger ribonucleic acid, or mRNA for short, is one of the types of RNA that are found in the cell. This type, like most RNAs, are normally made in the cell nucleus and then exported to the cytoplasm. In the cytoplasm, ribosomes (the cell’s protein-making machinery) translate the instructions in the mRNA to synthesise the specific protein encoded in the mRNA sequence. So, the DNA for one gene can be transcribed into an mRNA molecule that will end up making one specific protein.
When the ribosomes come across the mRNA released from the LNP package into the cytoplasm, instead of the natural process of release from the cell nucleus, they start to build the specific proteins encoded in the vaccine payload. This matches with the viral action of Battle Plan point 12 in (Scientists v God).
What happens once these proteins are built inside the cytoplasm? Firstly, after the mRNA is read and the protein building process has begun, the mRNA is destroyed by the cell. Destruction of the mRNA ensures that the cell does not make too much of one type of protein. Different mRNAs within the same cell have distinct lifetimes (stabilities). In mammalian cells, mRNA lifetimes range from several minutes to days. The greater the stability of an mRNA the more protein may be produced from that mRNA. The limited lifetime of mRNA enables a cell to alter protein synthesis rapidly in response to its changing needs. But what are those needs for an alien presence?
The vaccines’ mRNA should degrade in the cells after producing the foreign protein. However, because the specific formulation is kept confidential by the pharmaceutical manufacturers of the candidate mRNA vaccines, details and timings have not been researched yet by third parties. This is clearly a little worrying since we have no way of knowing how many protein molecules each mRNA molecule can assemble before its destruction or even if it contains any detail for its destruction! Furthermore, the overall processes involved in mRNA degradation generally do not seem to be very well understood anyway. Perhaps even the manufacturers do not know the answer to this question. This is clearly of some considerable potential concern! However, I am not sure the mRNA longevity actually matters if the cell is marked for destruction anyway (see two paragraphs on).
Proteasomes in the cytoplasm recognise the viral antigen protein produced by the ribosomes as foreign material. Proteosomes (http://pdb101.rcsb.org/motm/166) are the recyclers of damaged or alien proteins as I described in Battle Plan point 10 of Scientists v God. Proteasomes break the alien proteins down to several peptide pieces. The next step is for MHC (Major Histocompatibility Complex) molecules (https://thebiologynotes.com/major-histocompatibility-complex-mhc/#antigen-presentation-and-processing) to attach to the antigen pieces and transport them to the cellular membrane. It appears that even in its broken-down form the individual pieces will have several recognisable features that the immune system can pick up from the MHC items that have been brought up to the cell’s surface.
Once presented on the ‘infected’ cell’s surface, the antigen particles will then be subject to attack by the body’s immune system in the form of T cells and B cells. The T cells (https://www.thoughtco.com/t-cells-meaning-373354) destroy the infected cells thereby removing all traces of the infected material within the cell. This would include any residual mRNA not already destroyed by the intra-cellular processes. The B cells (https://askabiologist.asu.edu/b-cell) provide the main object of the vaccine by responding to the antigens by generating the antibodies against the various elements of the antigen to provide the longer-term immune response to any future attack from the same virus or potentially similar viral variant.
For an overview of the whole process, Wikipedia provides a good synopsis including a helpful graphic (reproduced at the top of this paper): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RNA_vaccine, as does this website for the biologists among my readers: https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/what-are-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-science-to-help-debunk-myths/
How the Coronavirus Replicates Compared with the Adenovirus
My paper (Scientists v God) describes how the Adenovirus attacks the human cell and replicates once inside. And here is that surprise that I promised you in the introduction to this paper; it turns out that there are many different mechanisms that the various types of virus use to get inside a human cell to replicate. The RNA-carrying Coronavirus acts in a different way to the DNA-carrying Adenovirus. Essentially this means that the Coronavirus does not have to enter the cell nucleus to start its replication process. Its payload can be delivered directly to the ribosomes in the extra-nuclear cell environment. The good news is that it does not, therefore, need to utilise the cell’s DNA machinery. The bad news is that it does not have to evade the nucleus’ defences to initiate its own replication processes.
The following websites indicate the detailed Coronavirus attack mechanism for the interested reader: https://stanmed.stanford.edu/2020issue2/how-coronavirus-destroys-cells-treatments.html; https://www.chemistryviews.org/details/ezine/11225161/Coronavirus_Entering_and_Replicating_in_a_Host_Cell.html. This latter website, amongst other things, identifies bats as a common spreader of coronaviruses. I wonder if mankind’s fictional obsession with vampire bats actually has some demonic reality behind it??
Given my comments later on in this paper, on the Covid-19 spike protein, it would seem that the protein spike itself may be damaging to the vascular system (https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/overview-of-the-vascular-system) even without any direct impact from the virus itself! Amongst other things, this explains the broad variety of different and serious symptoms that are caused by the viral attack. It also adds further credence to the LW position that the spike protein has been pre-eminently prophesied in scripture as a demonic weapon: https://scitechdaily.com/covid-19-is-a-vascular-disease-coronavirus-spike-protein-attacks-vascular-system-on-a-cellular-level/.
Comparison of the mRNA Vaccine Actions to That of The ‘Live’ Coronavirus
At first sight it seems to me that the vaccine acts like the virus which, arguably, is what it is supposed to do. For a fuller comparison, I shall now go through a brief point by-point comparison between the previous sections on the mechanisms of the mRNA vaccines with the relevant ones of the Adenovirus viral army described in my previous paper (Scientists v God). The item numbering system corresponds to the relevant item in that latter paper.
Point 3: When the vaccine enters the bloodstream, the LNP enables its payload to be ignored by the white blood cells and antibodies whereas a live virus would be recognised as such and would be attacked by the body's immune system. For a typical large-scale incursion, many viruses will nonetheless survive this attack to advance to the next stage of infection.
Point 5: To gain entry to a cell’s outer membrane a virus will make use of its projecting protein ‘key’. The vaccine’s LNP encapsulation enables its payload to gain entrance to the outer cell membrane as a nutrient without the need for a ‘key’. Entry for both is by the ‘pinched bubble’ endosome mechanism described previously.
Point 6: In both cases the outer shells of the virus and the LNP capsule are eaten away by the endosome’s acid bath thereby releasing their respective mRNA payloads for ribosome replication.
It is here that the 'brief' similarity between the mRNA Coronavirus and the DNA Adenovirus comes to an end.
Risks of Taking the mNRA Vaccines
As I stated at the start of this paper, one of the main reasons for writing it in the first case was related to the bad press the mRNA vaccines provoked from the ‘conspiracy theory’ camp. So, let us have a look at the real risks associated with these vaccines. One acknowledged risk is associated with potential longer term effects of this novel technology given that it has never been used on such a large scale before and has been released to the public on an emergency basis with the longer term effects completely untested (https://www.jpost.com/health-science/could-an-mrna-vaccine-be-dangerous-in-the-long-term-649253). The world’s public are consequently guinea pigs being subjected to what is, in effect, a large-scale clinical field test whilst being told that the vaccines are perfectly safe and have been fully tested. Apart from anything else, this is a clear case of governments blatantly lying to their citizens. In that context, how about this for a piece of government coercion: https://patient.info/news-and-features/how-to-speak-to-someone-whos-hesitant-about-vaccines. This item alone tells me to follow my own advice rather than adhere to that of the UK Government or the medical profession at this point in time!
The important point to note is that these vaccines have been released under emergency provisions, given the perceived extent of the global pandemic. On the FDA’s own admission, this means that the vaccines have not been fully field tested and therefore come with the risk that there may be longer-term effects from them that have not yet become apparent as the following paper acknowledges: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained.
A potentially serious longer-term effect is Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE). Surprisingly, the immune response to any vaccine or viral infection can include the production of a relatively small percentage of antibodies that actually help the antigens to infect the human cells. Nobody seems to understand why this happens but, nonetheless, it is a well-documented issue with the human immune system. Now, while the overall concentration of antibodies in the blood stream is high, i.e., for the first couple of months of inoculation, this is not a problem since the high concentration of neutralising antibodies does its job.
A potential risk can occur after this period when the overall concentration is reduced to a level that the errant antibodies can start to have a measurable impact. Signs of this would likely occur some 3-6 months after immunisation of a single or booster jab. The symptomatic consequences of the ADE syndrome are such that the viral effects, of a further infection during this period, are magnified to the extent that serious illness and/or death will be the normal consequence. Therefore, I intend to keep a close watch on events in Israel as the lead nation in taking the Pfizer vaccine. (By the way, is it not a demonic irony that it is the physical nation of Israel that holds the first past the post honour in this particular race?). If these symptoms do not start to become apparent by the September 2021 timeframe (accounting for the schedule for booster jabs), then I would consider that the global field test would have proved successful for the vaccine! A well-balanced piece on ADE is to be found at: https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2020/12/18/antibody-dependent-enhancement. A rigorous medical explanation for those that have the time and interest: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcp.13795. And, since I have mentioned booster shots, here is an interesting piece on why booster shots are recommended to provide more protection: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210114-covid-19-how-effective-is-a-single-vaccine-dose?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-en-GB.
I would also argue that, at this stage of events (May 2021), the efficacy of the vaccines is also unproven. It is arguable that infection rates are currently reducing due to lockdown and other preventative measures. The vaccines will not be proven to provide protection until these measures are relaxed and infection rates still do not rise as a result: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-risks-of-rushing-a-covid-19-vaccine/.
Another consideration is the various vaccines’ effectiveness against Covid-19 variants. It would seem that the official consensus, unsurprisingly, seems to be that the current versions will have their effectiveness reduced according to lab tests which will only truly play out in the field as already discussed: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2021-03-immune-vaccines-struggle-emerging-coronavirus.html. I expect this would ultimately become endemic like the annual flu jab where new variants are added to the list every year to maintain current levels of protection.
Even the LNPs discussed earlier may contribute to serious allergic reactions: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/12/suspicions-grow-nanoparticles-pfizer-s-covid-19-vaccine-trigger-rare-allergic-reactions. Certainly, in the UK, any prospective vaccine recipient on auto-immune medication will be given the Astra-Zeneca vaccine, not an mRNA option: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/12/suspicions-grow-nanoparticles-pfizer-s-covid-19-vaccine-trigger-rare-allergic-reactions. Also, the PEG content of the LNP carries its own mRNA risks: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/components-of-mrna-technology-could-lead-to-significant-adverse-events-in-one-or-more-of-our-clinical-trials-says-moderna/.
In addition, the efficacy of any vaccine in its ability to immunise the older and more vulnerable members of society should be weighed against the risks that the vaccine may pose versus that of getting the virus under a lockdown regime. The facts after the event of vaccination should be taken into account: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/46-residents-in-spanish-nursing-home-die-after-receiving-covid-19-vaccine. Also, this article on patients contracting Covid-19 after receiving their first shot: https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/1430834/coronavirus-uk-latest-update-vaccine-admitted-to-hospital.
Whilst I would not necessarily agree with every point made, the following webpage has an early but nonetheless interesting comparison of the Moderna v Astra-Zeneca vaccines, together with a commentary on the ethics of pharmaceutical companies plus consideration of the mRNA auto-immune risk: https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/coronavirus-vaccine-covid-19-cure-doctor-moderna-novavax-oxford-a9523091.html. Just to add further fuel to the fire of pharmaceutical ethics and the great conspiracy theories that abound, we now have the banning of the AZ vaccine: https://time.com/5947134/astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-stopped/?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-en-GB. Now, whilst I believe that this very rare form of thrombosis is almost certainly caused by the AZ vaccine, I would ask what studies have been carried out looking for similar responses to the mRNA vaccines? None as far as I am aware. Is this risk any more serious than all those already identified for the mRNA vaccines which have not been banned? There certainly seems to be a concerted effort from all ‘official’ quarters to get us to take the mRNA vaccines does there not? I wonder why??
While writing this paper, a new potential link between taking the Pfizer vaccine and the onset of a shingles outbreak has been mooted: https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19vaccine/92106. Well, as far as I am personally concerned, this is real. Someone, close to me, has had an attack of shingles some three weeks after taking the first Pfizer injection. This lasted some three weeks and was followed by an allergic rash over several areas of the body. I also know of someone else who got a serious rash also some three weeks or so after having the second jab. Could this be the ulcers promised to us in scripture?
Also these reports, of heart inflammation amongst the younger recipients of the Pfizer vaccination, from Israel are very worrying to say the least: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-examining-heart-inflammation-cases-people-who-received-pfizer-covid-shot-2021-04-25/ and https://www.health.com/condition/infectious-diseases/coronavirus/pfizer-vaccine-heart-inflammation-myocarditis. And not only in Israel as a specific result only of the Pfizer vaccine: https://orthomolecular.activehosted.com/index.php?action=social&chash=502e4a16930e414107ee22b6198c578f.257&s=7b3969c524f773fe9afc9256064d3c50
I think this following article serves extremely well in closing this section. It is critical of all vaccines albeit with specific adverse commentary on the mRNA vaccines. It encompasses criticism of the corporate interests and the effective self-policing of the pharmaceutical industry and weak policing by the public bodies entrusted with their populations’ health interests. It makes extremely uncomfortable reading and justifies my own lifelong avoidance of all but essential vaccines where possible: https://www.bulatlat.com/2020/08/21/hazards-of-the-covid-19-vaccine/. Oh yes, and while we are on this theme, let us not forget ‘Vaccine Associated Virus Interference’ which should also give us all pause before accepting any vaccine, especially for a virus that attacks the respiratory tracts: https://www.unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/military-study-finds-flu-vaccine-increases-coronavirus-risk-by-36/; https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m626/rr; https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31607599.
And to finally round off this section an appropriate cautionary word from a medical practitioner with his eyes wide open: https://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2020/12/what-worries-this-physician-about-the-covid-19-vaccine.html.
So, let us move on to one of the main Covid-19 phenomena that has prompted me to write this paper in the first place. Whilst not an extreme or unwarranted conspiracy theorist for the most part, I have been more than a little suspicious of political propaganda associated with the Covid-19 precautionary measures. These comprise the wearing of face masks, social distancing and lockdown procedures, together with the persuading compunctions to take the vaccines on offer. This combined with the main media supporting government policy unequivocally. Since when did that happen previously? On top of that we also have big tech supporting this theme by blocking and banning any media that may have a different tale to tell on the matter. (All the links in this webpage were intact at the time of publication; if my reader should determine that any of them are missing, I should be very grateful if you would advise me via my Help Desk messaging facility. Oh yes, and we need not talk about the vocal medical and pharmaceutical mantra on the subject. I suspect they are as wrong about this as they still are about statins preventing heart disease!! (https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/books-by-dr-malcolm-kendrick/the-great-cholesterol-con/).
Whilst this has been bad enough, I have also been appalled by the obviously fake news on the antivaxx side of the divide. Much of this news has been so extreme as to end up effectively supporting the mainstream position through its lunacy. This has led me to believe that much of the fake body politic is in cahoots with government and corporate media. It presents an even more disconcerting picture of the breadth and reality of a real conspiracy to disenfranchise, disarm, imprison, experiment on and murder the world’s population at large which could lead to the making of a second Nuremburg trial: https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/22/second-nuremberg-trial-being-sought-by-lawyers-and-medical-professionals-worldwide-against-who-wef-cdc-and-world-leaders/. The following well-balanced article shows the dilemma many thinking people have when faced with the extreme conspiracy theorists on the one hand and the government, media and big pharma on the other: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2021/apr/08/among-covid-sceptics-we-are-being-manipulated-anti-lockdown?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-en-GB.
Having done a very recent search, it is looking like many of the fake news sites have been removed from the web or You Tube since I started writing this paper. Funny huh?? I tried using several alternative search engines but still came up dry. I could no longer easily find sites that disagreed with taking any of the Covid-19 vaccines and many left-field theories on the origin of the Coronavirus seem to have mysteriously disappeared from the web. Well, if I was not an extreme conspiracy theorist before, I certainly am one now. But this is no theory, this is clear evidence that the whole of the internet has been locked down, no doubt by our friends at Google, Facebook, Twitter etc. The internet is clearly no longer a free and open form of information flow. Websites that provided a reasoned argument to not take the vaccine have also been taken down.
I did, however, still find one or two examples on the mRNA vaccines being a form of gene therapy: https://treatforlife.com/is-mrna-vaccine-a-gene-therapy/. I would have to say that not everything in the above link is incorrect. However, it does make emotional play on some untruths or interpretational gameplay which end up compromising the whole paper. Likewise, for the following script: https://www.westonaprice.org/podcast/its-gene-therapy-not-a-vaccine/.
These are typical in that it becomes a minefield of trying to extract fact from fiction. They can easily mislead those who are not prepared or able to put in the hard detailed work to get at the truth of the matter. Whilst I have already expressed my concern at the introduction of the mRNA vaccines’ payloads into the cellular structure, I would not consider them to represent gene therapy, in its original intent. There is no involvement of the cellular nucleus and any change to the recipients’ DNA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_therapy.
And then we have the Dave Martin interview…..: https://rumble.com/vd6jjp-david-martin-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html. This one certainly comes across with an air of plausibility which may be why it has not yet been marked for total destruction. Having watched the whole video, I did notice a significant change in its tone about halfway through. Having got the patent piece out of the way, it then seemed to suddenly change direction with the US’s weaponizing of the virus and its transfer to China. This was seemingly with little additional evidence from what I could make out. Being ultra-cautious in these matters, I find myself considering this video, in net terms, to be a very believable but nonetheless a fake piece of news. If somebody could convince me it is not, then I am open to a second opinion. In the meantime, here are a couple of links decrying the DM interview: https://www.factcheck.org/2020/08/new-plandemic-video-peddles-misinformation-conspiracies/; https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/plandemic-documentary-wild-theory-virus-trail-goes-back-to-1999/news-story/bec8d46d2a5f1d0ba9e736f3969bdc27.
Here we have a little fake news item that still seems to be available on its own platform: https://www.sgtreport.com/2021/03/medical-shocker-scientists-at-sloan-kettering-discover-mrna-inactivates-tumor-suppressing-proteins-meaning-it-can-promote-cancer/. This is typical of all the fake news websites that misuse real news and (deliberately?) devalue the real fight against the ruling classes. So, let us have a look at the truth of the matter on this story.
Here is the referenced website of Sloan Kettering who (used to be!) a highly respected cancer research laboratory and hospital: https://www.mskcc.org/news/sloan-kettering-institute-researchers-look-beyond-dna-identify-cancer-drivers. The original article dates back to 2018, i.e., prior to the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. It advises that cancerous tumours can be caused by truncated cancer-suppressing mRNA-produced proteins. However, if one then looks at the later links on their webpage, we see that they are telling us that all the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines cannot cause cancer: https://www.mskcc.org/coronavirus/what-s-different-about-messenger-rna-vaccines-covid-19. How can they know that since the vaccines have not been tested for long-term effects? By their own admission, the research to determine such matters is a long and winding road. Consequently, these vaccine statements must be politically and therefore not medically derived. This therefore demonstrates very clearly that their statements are no longer to be trusted and is once again evidence of my growing conspiracy theory to get the population vaccinated by mRNA vaccines at any cost (to the population). The Sloan-Kettering additional page on the ‘benefits’ of the vaccines seems to be nothing but a pack of lies. Why is a cancer- specialising medical facility providing and recommending the Covid-19 vaccines? Why does the site tell us that the vaccine’s mRNA only lasts for 72 hours when it does not matter since the infected cells get shredded - or do they? Oh yes, and remember the pharmaceutical companies are treating that data as commercial in confidence, so how can Sloan-Kettering know and publish that data anyway?
Whilst I would not necessarily consider the following links to be fake news in themselves or indeed, the data to which it refers, together they do indicate that there is no information available from any source that is reliable or believable: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/297051 and http://www.nakim.org/israel-forums/viewtopic.php?t=270812. This is why I wrote this paper; I believe very little of what information is available out there from any source which, to me, demonstrates the profile of a grand cover-up. I wanted to do my own research, limited as it may be from available sources, so that I could make up my own mind about what is really going on. I am finding that the bible is the only source that is worth reading and interpreting as you will find out in the next section.
LW View of Coronavirus
The Lords’ Witnesses certainly have a strong view on the whole Coronavirus/vaccine/testing/certification/lockdown scenario which they feel is a concerted effort by the deep state, top ranking medical profession, big tech and big Pharma together with the main media to deceive and control the masses. We believe that these organisations are all under the control of the demons which have been allowed down to earth for a limited period to continue their evil ways amongst mankind, albeit according to God’s own plan for the judgement of men and angels alike:
10 Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times [the things] that are not [yet] done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure: (Isaiah 46 KJV)
12 For our wrestling is not against flesh and blood, but against the principalities, against the powers, against the world-rulers of this darkness, against the spiritual [hosts] of wickedness in the heavenly [places]. (Ephesians 6 ASV)
5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty [and] two months. (Revelation 13 KJV)
3 and threw him into the abyss, and shut him up, and sealed over him, that he should not still lead astray the nations, until the thousand years are fulfilled. And after these things, he must be set loose a little time. (Revelation 20 GLT)
This is clearly a major conspiracy theory, but it is based on our understanding of the bible code as it relates to the end-times prophecy and is therefore not merely a theory. The detail of that understanding is contained within the following link: http://www.truebiblecode.com/mRNA.html. Whilst I do not necessarily subscribe to all the detailed argumentation within this understanding, I will now provide a summary of the aspects that I do support.
First off there are a couple of scriptures that indicate that a deep and secretive end-times conspiracy is supported by the Word of God:
2 But there is nothing carefully concealed that will not be revealed, and secret that will not become known. (Luke 12 NWT)
9 And he went on to say: Go, Daniel, because the words are made secret and sealed up until the time of [the] end.
10 Many will cleanse themselves and whiten themselves and will be refined. And the wicked ones will certainly act wickedly, and no wicked ones at all will understand; but the ones having insight will understand. (Daniel 12 NWT)
So, we see that there is much going on in the world that is hidden from public view. Only those given the wisdom of God’s Word (Wisdom) will understand what is really happening behind closed doors. So, whilst conspiracy theories abound there will only be one that will be a factual conspiracy. Hence, I argue that most conspiracy theorists are actually supporting the demonic cause whilst appearing otherwise.
Going back to the start of this struggle between good and evil we see that Satan’s seed will be in contention with Eve’s seed; the progeny of Cain versus that of Abel down through the generations:
15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. (Genesis 3 KJV)
12 Not as Cain, [who] was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother's righteous. (1 John 3 KJV)
The Hebrew word for Cain has the English meaning of ‘spear’. It is from this that the LWs associate the coronavirus pandemic with the virus’ spike protein and the needles required for the vaccine and the nasal swabs required for viral testing. We see all these as parts of the demonic armoury to attack humanity at this time. To expand on this argument, we understand that the mark of the beast of Revelation 13 is the mark of Cain of Genesis 4:15:
15 And Jehovah said to him, If anyone kills Cain, he shall be avenged sevenfold. And Jehovah set a mark on Cain, so that anyone who found him should not kill him. (Genesis 4 GLT)
In the end-times, to be condemned to the second death men will both worship the beast and carry its mark. This is linked to the plague, meted out by the first of the seven of God’s angels, which will show itself as bodily sores. The LWs believe this will be caused from Cain’s weapons of the virus, vaccines or test swabs. We do not think the original strain of SARS-CoV-2 will be that virus since there have been far more damaging plagues in the past. We think a future variant will be the end-times pestilence since we are not yet in the Great Tribulation at the time of writing (May 2021); the demons are just getting warmed up! As I mentioned earlier, I already know people who have developed shingles and rashes shortly after receiving the Pfizer vaccination; could this be an early sign of the biblical sores to come:
8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. (Revelation 13 KJV)
2 And the first went, and poured out his bowl into the earth; and it became a noisome and grievous sore upon the men that had the mark of the beast, and that worshipped his image. (Revelation 16 ASV)
Let us take a further look at the mark:
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: (KJV)
16καὶ ποιεῖ πάντας, τοὺς μικροὺς καὶ τοὺς μεγάλους, καὶ τοὺς πλουσίους καὶ τοὺς πτωχούς, καὶ τοὺς ἐλευθέρους καὶ τοὺς δούλους, ἵνα δῶσιν αὐτοῖς χάραγμα ἐπὶ τῆς χειρὸς αὐτῶν τῆς δεξιᾶς ἢ ἐπὶ τὸ μέτωπον αὐτῶν (WHO)
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. (Revelation 13 KJV)
17καὶ ἵνα μή τις δύνηται ἀγοράσαι ἢ πωλῆσαι εἰ μὴ ὁ ἔχων τὸ χάραγμα, τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ θηρίου ἢ τὸν ἀριθμὸν τοῦ ὀνόματος αὐτοῦ (Revelation 13 WHO)
The Greek word ‘αὐτῶν’ commonly translated above as ‘forehead’ literally means ‘the space between the eyes’, i.e., the bridge of the nose. When one takes the PCR test, a swab is put right up into your nose precisely between your eyes. The Greek word ‘χάραγμα’ commonly translated above as ‘mark’ can take the literal meaning of ‘scratch’ or ‘etching’. So, arguably, the scratching up in the space between the eyes is a nasal COVID swab which takes mucous from one’s nasal cavity leaving an etching in mucous left behind. So here we have some biblical evidence that the Covid-19 swab testing can cause the ‘mark in the forehead’.
And then we come to the mark in their right hand. Could this be a 'social credit' masquerading as a mobile phone Covid-19 health app: Julia Hartley-Brewer: What the hell does this have to do with Covid jabs!? - YouTube
What follows is my personal view of some of the key points on the material within the above LW understanding, based on the research that I have carried out on my own behalf on the vaccines.
First off, I am certainly not happy at the way the LNPs gain cellular entry for the mRNA vaccines. However, from my understanding of how the immune system works, it involves the destruction of any cells expressing alien proteins on their outer membrane. Since the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA is alien to our genetic make-up, it cannot be used in the production of any cellular material in the body. If this is the case, then the mRNA protein only has a limited lifespan in the human body so cannot represent anything other than a transient change to our genetic make-up. This especially since it does not enter the cell nucleus where our DNA resides. What is relatively permanent is that the Coronavirus spike protein is coded into our antibody protection. I am not entirely sure that represents our seed since then every infection we have ever got would come into that category. However, all of those items would have been the production of Satan and his crew at the creation. Maybe we have all been carrying around Satan’s seed since Adamic mankind got the first infection?
I think, in net terms, that whilst I am on board for LW thinking related to the seed of Satan being delivered into mankind through the virus, vaccines and nasal testing, I do not see this as genetic engineering in the generally understood definition. Check this out to confirm that the mRNA vaccines will not alter one’s DNA: https://www.deplatformdisease.com/blog/no-really-mrna-vaccines-are-not-going-to-affect-your-dna. Also, this item shows the risk of nasal swab testing even without consideration of a deliberate insertion of alien genetic material: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ene.14736. And this would seem to be not the only risk inherent in swab testing: https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/21/covid-pcr-test-swabs-are-as-dangerous-as-inhaling-asbestos/.
Notwithstanding this specific point, I believe the holistic view of a bible-based conspiracy theory is real. This would include the virus itself although we think the biblical proportion pestilence will have a much greater impact on human lives than SARS-CoV-2 has to date (May 2021) and will probably therefore be based on a yet to be seen highly virulent variant or the result of the vaccines/swab testing. From the scriptures we can interpret that the virus is, indeed, a bioweapon made and designed by the demons. I do, however, have an issue with this from a virology perspective. I have read numerous reports claiming that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was man-made and those reporting the very opposite. Looking at both sides, I was left with the strong impression that the reports that it was man-made were based on speculation and some clearly fake claims whereas the natural variation camp seemed to be based on good scientific grounds. I will let you, the reader, decide for yourself based on this small but representative sample: https://healthfeedback.org/could-scientists-use-the-bat-coronavirus-ratg13-to-engineer-sars-cov-2-the-virus-that-causes-covid-19-in-a-lab/; https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-not-human-made-in-lab.html; https://www.livemint.com/news/world/nobel-winning-scientist-claims-covid-19-virus-was-man-made-in-wuhan-lab-11587303649821.html. In net terms, I do not think the virus being man-made is realistic since it would take great expertise to produce such a deliberately damaging virus. However, it would not be beyond the capability of demon-possessed virologists to produce a lethal virus given they would have had a lot of practice during the original creation period in creating such overtly evil devices!
In addition, we have the provision of an environment in which the population masses will be placed into a vulnerable state via facemasks, hand gels and lockdowns aka effective house arrest. Following on from this we are getting the pressure to take a vaccine and follow-on testing and certification which could easily end up as the implementation of the mark of the beast. It is worth looking at this briefing from The Nuffield Council on Bioethics: https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/publications/covid-19-antibody-testing-and-immunity-certification/read-the-briefing. Amongst other issues for consideration, it identifies our sheer lack of knowledge of the characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and cautions against the use of test certification.
I started writing this paper in response to the LW view originally being that mRNA vaccines were particularly pernicious. The mRNA vaccines act like the SARS-CoV-2 virus to gain outer cellular entry and do not require nuclear entry. In reviewing the latest LW position above, it started to become clear to me that, and I quote from that understanding: ‘Astra Zeneca is possibly worse than Pfizer being a DNA infecting virus’. Yes, it appears that a viral vector vaccine like AZ will invade the cellular nucleus and start to replicate the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein built into the viral structure: http://globalhealthprimer.emory.edu/targets-technologies/viral-vector-vaccines.html and https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/health/oxford-astrazeneca-covid-19-vaccine.html. The infected cell should be destroyed by the immune system. However, the cases of thrombosis from the AZ vaccine that have been sited, may be evidence that it has not been weakened enough? My paper started out evaluating the dangers of the mRNA vaccines; it is now looking like the AZ and J&J viral vector vaccines may be far more dangerous in the seed of Cain context! These vaccines DO act like the Adenovirus by inserting DNA into the human cell not just mRNA! However, I am still left wondering why the authorities seem hell-bent on banning the AZ vaccine in favour of the equally untested mRNA vaccines!
Another paper to be found on the LW website is: http://www.truebiblecode.com/understanding917.html. As per the previous paper I will provide a summary as follows. The key point in this understanding is that there are three parallel accounts, in the gospels, of the Roman soldiers braiding a crown of thorns and putting it on Jesus' head. By the parallel account principle of the True Bible Code, there are several greater meanings which combine to make a whole picture in which all three accounts share the same symbolism. Whilst much of that meaning in our understanding is of a spiritual nature and about the True Christian Churches, I will stick solely to the secular and worldly meanings as we currently see them, since this is the purpose of this paper:
27 Then the soldiers of the governor took Jesus into the common hall, and gathered unto him the whole band [of soldiers].
28 And they stripped him, and put on him a scarlet robe.
29 And when they had platted a crown of thorns, they put [it] upon his head, and a reed in his right hand: and they bowed the knee before him, and mocked him, saying, Hail, King of the Jews!
30 And they spit upon him, and took the reed, and smote him on the head.
31 And after that they had mocked him, they took the robe off from him, and put his own raiment on him, and led him away to crucify [him]. (Matthew 27 KJV)
16 And the soldiers led him away into the hall, called Praetorium; and they call together the whole band.
17 And they clothed him with purple, and platted a crown of thorns, and put it about his [head],
18 And began to salute him, Hail, King of the Jews!
19 And they smote him on the head with a reed, and did spit upon him, and bowing [their] knees worshipped him.
20 And when they had mocked him, they took off the purple from him, and put his own clothes on him, and led him out to crucify him. (Mark 15 KJV)
1 Then Pilate therefore took Jesus, and scourged [him].
2 And the soldiers platted a crown of thorns, and put [it] on his head, and they put on him a purple robe,
3 And said, Hail, King of the Jews! and they smote him with their hands.
4 Pilate therefore went forth again, and saith unto them, Behold, I bring him forth to you, that ye may know that I find no fault in him.
5 Then came Jesus forth, wearing the crown of thorns, and the purple robe. And [Pilate] saith unto them, Behold the man! (John 19 KJV)
The Roman soldiers in the above accounts represent demon-possessed members of the US military. The US is identified here since the third True Christian Church, The Watchtower, is headquartered in US. The platting or twining of the crown of thorns represents the creation of the Coronavirus (or later variant) in producing its DNA double-helix. So, scripture is telling us that the virus is, indeed, a man-made bioweapon albeit requiring demonic action to develop. This understanding is further supported in the name of the Coronavirus which is derived from the Latin corona, meaning "crown". Also, the thorns of the crown represent the Coronavirus protein spike that is the virus’ mechanism for human cell entry. The soldiers’ spitting on Jesus demonstrates the main way that the virus is spread, i.e., via airborne exhaled droplets. The soldiers’ hitting Jesus upon the head with the reed and thereby forcing the thorns into his head represents getting the viral infection via a vaccine injection. It looks like the LWs are not alone in considering the analogy with Christ’s crown of thorns: https://www.bworldonline.com/coronavirus-mankinds-crown-of-thorns/; https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/why-is-it-called-coronavirus#why-is-it-called-coronavirus; https://caravanmagazine.in/bookshelf/crown-of-thorns.
Another scripture to consider, in this understanding, demonstrates the demons’ attack upon the physical nation of Israel. It seems to me to be the ultimate demonic irony that Israel is leading the world with the earliest and highest proportion of their population inoculated with the Pfizer vaccine. Luke predicts this in an end-times prophetic meaning. I think the pointed stakes analogy is self-evident in the current circumstances of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic:
43 Because the days will come upon you when your enemies will build around you a fortification with pointed stakes and will encircle you and distress you from every side, (Luke 19 NWT)
From a scriptural standpoint, I do not have too many issues with this understanding. However, whilst I am certainly not denying the possibility that the Coronavirus was designed in a US military weapons laboratory, I am not prepared to accept Dave Martin’s interview as proof since I consider that to be fake news, albeit convincingly delivered (see previous section). Ditto Professor Boyle who is a legal counsel not a virologist so is totally unqualified as an expert to be making such claims without verifiable evidence. I believe these guys are themselves demonic since they are effectively adding to the anti-conspiracy theory camp! As always, the art of successful deception is to hide the lie behind a half-truth to make it sound plausible. Also, I would not put too much confidence into any of the other links in this understanding since they appear to be based on opinion and unsubstantiated hearsay from people that, no doubt, have a personal interest in promoting these stories. NB. One of the links actually rubbishes the conspiracy theory!
Overall, my view of the LW understandings is that we should stick to scripture and not spend too much time on man’s interpretations of current pandemic events except where they are clearly factual and evidence based. I think it is particularly dangerous for us to fit other men’s views to our own just because it supports our position. As I have said elsewhere, I believe that some of the websites referenced to support our position in the above understandings are fake, in my opinion. I will not put any credence in them myself, regardless of how convenient or convincing their opinions may be for our purposes. The bible should tell us all we need to know. Amen.
Well, this could take the planning of a global conspiracy to a whole new level:
So, what does this excellent piece of work truly represent? Is it a genuinely inciteful piece of research to help those with prospective responsibilities in the management of a medical and/or communications response to what would be a future theoretical pandemic? Or is it a scary insight to a demonic plan that is now unfolding before our very eyes? As in all communications on this subject, either could be the case since this is in the nature of a good deception. Once again, I let you the reader decide for yourselves. My own comments on the document are as follows:
SPARS was specifically identified as the threat from a prospective Coronavirus outbreak. This is probably not too surprising given earlier recent epidemics. However, I would have thought something far more aggressive, akin to the Spanish Flu, might have been chosen if the object of the exercise was to enable the required response to be properly exercised. Given the world’s actual response to Covid-19, which in historic terms is not that virulent an epidemic, it does not seem to have made much difference. The world’s response is fragmented, disorganised, undermining of world populations and trade and subject to much public dissension. Mind you the production of vaccines was remarkably quick off the mark was it not!? So, was this exercise a warning or a ‘plan’? This is the main reader question, I think!
The first identified similarity between the SPARS and SARS-CoV-2 viruses is that both have extended incubation plus latency periods of up to 2 weeks. This was explicitly identified as a criterion for the SPARS disease. It was selected for SPARS as a major consideration in the isolation of patients and the population at large and is typical for a SARS type infection as we see it playing out for Covid-19.
In comparison with most SARS type outbreaks, including Covid-19, SPARS originated in US, not China. Was this the John Hopkins project team understandably concentrating on the US impact of SPARS? Was it their masking of the actual ‘plan’ for Covid-19? Or were they just being politically correct by not shaking the already fraught tree of US-Chinese relations? Or was the conspiratorial transport of the man-made virus from US to China in their minds (as purported by Dave Martin)? A reader question or three!
Younger people were selected by the project team to be those most at risk of contracting SPARS. From an age perspective, this is quite different from the previous experience gained with similar viruses, like SARS-CoV-2, which have a very different profile in being more virulent in older age groups. (This website has some useful comparisons between SARS and Covid-19 symptoms: https://www.healthline.com/health/coronavirus-vs-sars#covid-19-vs-sars.) One might be very cynical and suggest that the SARS-CoV-2 strain was deliberately ‘designed’ to remove the world’s overhead of an aging population! Although initially specified differently to Covid-19, the initial SPARS at-risk group was extended to enable vaccinations to be made to all age groups after the most vulnerable had been targeted for the initial vaccine uptake as per Covid-19.
Regarding SPARS vaccine development and distribution, the pharmaceutical companies were to be provided with liability cover in cases of health risk from the vaccines under the emergency use authorisation (the PREP act). This effectively means that claims for recipient damages against the vaccine manufacturers would not be enabled. This seems to have also been invoked for Covid-19: https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-are-pharmaceutical-companies-immune-covid-19-vaccine-lawsuits-1562793. So, emergency use procedures and the risk liability were both correctly predicted for SPARS and implemented for Covid-19. Compensation was to be made available for SPARS vaccine side-effect victims under the emergency liability provision in the United States. This is also the case for Covid-19 although they do seem to come with strings: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/25/compensation-for-victims-of-covid-vaccine-injuries-is-limited.html. The thinking seems to be that without this governmental provision then fewer people would be prepared to accept a vaccine under emergency authorisation. So, whilst the pharmaceutical companies are protected from direct prosecution from side-effect claims, the government schemes will compensate the victims with tax-payers’ money!
Conflicting official comments on the efficacy of the various vaccines were predicted for SPARS and is also the case for Covid-19. The difference for Covid-19, though, seems to be that government agencies are attempting to put actual numbers that reflect a positive outcome from taking the vaccines. I, for one, do not accept any of the figures as anything other than political spin. I cannot see how anyone can differentiate the benefit of a vaccine when taken in conjunction with the existing range of preventative measures such as social distancing, facemasks, lockdown etc. Interestingly, the SPARS projection identified that over-assurance on vaccine safety and efficacy could be counter-productive in the public eye. This seems to be something that today’s authorities do not seem to take any account of in their drive to get as many people vaccinated as possible. Another reader question: I wonder why? Interestingly, the SPARS paper quotes ‘WHO’s efforts promoted interventions originally designed for influenza and other similar respiratory pathogens, such as hygiene, social distancing, and isolation of suspected cases, all of which were less effective against SPARS'. Despite SPARS and SARS-CoV-2 being similar in nature (both being described as a novel coronavirus!), these factors have been carried through with much enforcement for Covid-19, at least in some countries. Does this mean that the medical profession has got the current set of preventions wrong or was the SPARS projection incorrect on this point (unlikely I would have thought)? Another reader question!
Heavy use of social media platforms was a major element of the SPARS projection and was predicted to be used by government agencies to promote the take-up of the newly produced and expedited vaccines. Countering this, Antivaxx, religious and BAME groups identified themselves as resistant to taking the vaccine. Some of this was based on the view that the vaccines had been rushed through their testing phases (sound familiar?). Anti-antivaxx also kicks off. This was correctly predicted and represents a scarily similar projection to what we have seen for Covid-19. None of the information is believable; everyone has their own agenda with the truth being the sole victim and, again, is the reason for my writing this paper to try to establish some semblance of the truth, hopefully to match LW biblical understandings on the matter!
Another accurately predicted phenomenon was that of the inequality of global provision of vaccine which was identified as an issue in the SPARS scenario. We have seen plenty of that for the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and not only in the ‘less well-developed nations’.
An interesting point in the SPARS scenario was that the virus, in serious cases, caused pneumonia which needed treatment with antibiotics. One significant problem, identified in this projection, was that there was a shortage of antibiotic drugs to deal with this serious after-effect. Whilst Covid-19 can also lead to pneumonia, I am not aware of a shortage of antibiotics. There are cases in some countries where ventilators or oxygen are in short supply which suggests that the treatment of pneumonia in Covid-19 cases is to treat the virus rather than a secondary bacterial infection. This seems quite different in the two scenarios and is leading me to wonder if we are actually treating the serious cases of Covid-19 correctly. I cannot imagine John Hopkins getting this wrong although it may well be that Covid-19 is a far more lethal respiratory virus than previously experienced from a SARS strain. This I do believe to be the case given my earlier comments on the dangers of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
SPARS vaccine side effect data significantly differed between official and unofficial sources. Short and long-term vaccine side-effects were identified but quantitative data proved difficult to establish. Covid-19 also has a similar profile which, again, raises the issue of the truth of the matter being the main casualty both in the prediction and the fact.
The SPARS epidemic was ruled as over after a period of nearly 3 years. At the time of my writing (May 2021), the Covid-19 pandemic has been with us for 18 months and is well into its second wave. Whether we are near the end of it or whether we are to witness a third wave remains to be seen. The concept of waves (or variants) does not appear to be present in the SPARS scenario. I find this odd since these wave profiles are common in epidemics, which is why they can be so lethal to human life after the first wave. Given the stated purpose of the SPARS exercise was to help prepare for the eventuality of an epidemic, they seem to have taken a soft option on this aspect of the prospective disease. This consequently makes me wonder why they thought SPARS would have lasted for as long as 3 years.
Now here is a little weirdness if you will. The SPARS scenario envisages power outages in the states of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, from a single source of supply during the epidemic. It was probably put in place to demonstrate that electronic forms of information would not have been available during the periods of blackout which would have disrupted the vaccine roll-out programme. It was careful to point out that emergency generators would have kicked in at the key health centres. Well call me paranoid, but I just heard about the recent Texas power outage in February 2021. Here the reported impact was quite different in that Covid-19 victims with home breathing equipment were put in severe risk: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/texans-recovering-covid-19-needed-oxygen-then-power-went-out-n1260065. I understand that Texas is the only US state with its own power supply, so perhaps the SPARS team picked the wrong state to predict their outage? Interesting that the point for SPARS was to prove the hospital backup generators rather than the home-based equipment; I am not too sure what to make of that?
An amusing, or perhaps not really that funny, fact is that the interestingly named light-emitting enzyme Luciferase was used as a biological marker in the Pfizer vaccine testing on mice! And this is official, presumably to counter the apparently fake claims that it is an ingredient of the human vaccine: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/summary-public-assessment-report-for-pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine. You will need to go down to Section 3.1 of this document to find the relevant references. The naming of this enzyme is no coincidence to my cynical mind!
A final note perhaps for those honest God-fearing folk who rightly put their trust in the Almighty rather than in the hands of mankind. God will protect His people through all the current manifestations of mankind’s demonic workings. I have, unusually, reproduced the whole of Psalm 91 to bring heart to all those seeking comfort in these troubled times. Amen:
1 He who dwells in the secret place of the Most High shall abide [in] the shade of the Almighty.
2 I will say to Jehovah: My Refuge and my Fortress, my God; I will trust in Him.
3 For He delivers you from the fowler's snare, from destruction's plague.
4 With His feathers He will cover you, and under His wings you shall seek refuge; His truth [is] a shield and buckler.
5 You shall not fear the terror of night, of the arrow [that] flies by day;
6 of the plague [that] walks in darkness, of the destruction laying waste at noonday.
7 A thousand shall fall by your side, and a myriad at your right hand; it shall not come near you.
8 Only with your eyes you shall look, and see the retribution of the wicked.
9 Because You, O Jehovah, [are] My refuge; You make the Most High Your habitation,
10 no evil shall happen to You, nor shall any plague come near Your tent.
11 For He shall give His angels charge over You, to keep You in all Your ways.
12 They shall bear You up in [their] hands, that You not dash Your foot on a stone.
13 You shall tread on the lion and adder; the young lion and the serpent You shall trample under foot.
14 Because He has set His love on Me, therefore I will deliver Him; I will set Him on high because He has known My name.
15 He shall call on Me and I will answer Him; I [will be] with Him in distress; I will rescue Him and honor Him.
16 I will satisfy him [with] length of days, and will make Him see My salvation. (Psalms 91 GLT)
Date of Publication: 30th May 2021
The mechanism of action of the RNA vaccine
Image From Wikipedia
Jewish Lords' Witness